PUMA New Men's Axelion Cross Trainer Black/White 10 Review
The PUMA New Men's Axelion Cross Trainer in Black/White is more than just a stylish sneaker; it’s engineered for those who demand performance without sacrificing aesthetics. Featuring a sleek and streamlined silhouette, this model sets itself apart with its combination of functionality and contemporary design. The synthetic leather upper provides durability while ensuring a snug fit, making it perfect for both training sessions and casual outings.
With an innovative midfoot saddle that enhances comfort and stability, you can trust this shoe to keep you supported through intense workouts or everyday wear. The EVA cushioning in the heel absorbs impact effectively, allowing for a smoother stride whether you're running on the track or hitting the gym.
Related Products
Features
- Product Type: Run-Train Performance Sneaker
- Closure Type: Lace Up
- Style: Axelion
- Outer Material: Synthetic
- Care Instructions: Machine Wash
- Water Resistance Level: Not Water Resistant
Pros
- Stylish and modern design suitable for various occasions
- Good comfort and fit due to the midfoot saddle
- Effective impact absorption from the EVA cushioning
- Versatile sneaker ideal for both training and casual wear
Cons
- Not water-resistant, may not be suitable for wet conditions
- Some users may find sizing slightly inconsistent
Comparison With Other Similar Products
| Feature | PUMA Axelion | Nike Air Zoom SuperRep | Adidas Ultraboost 21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Run-Train Performance | Training | Running |
| Closure Type | Lace Up | Lace Up | Lace Up |
| Outer Material | Synthetic | Textile/Synthetic | Mesh/Synthetic |
| Water Resistance | No | No | Water Resistant |
Detailed Review
When it comes to evaluating the PUMA New Men's Axelion Cross Trainer, several factors come into play including style, comfort, durability, and performance.
Style: The sleek black and white colorway of this sneaker offers a clean and modern look that pairs well with athletic gear and casual outfits alike. It’s a shoe designed with versatility in mind.
Comfort: Comfort is paramount, especially during active use. The midfoot saddle within the shoe provides excellent support, while the EVA cushioning absorbs shocks efficiently, ensuring your feet remain comfortable even during high-impact activities.
Durability: Constructed from synthetic leather, this sneaker stands up to wear and tear, which means it can accompany you on countless workouts without showing significant signs of aging.
Performance: Designed as a run-train hybrid, the Axelion excels in varying training environments. Whether you're sprinting, lifting weights, or training in a HIIT session, this sneaker adapts to your needs.
Detailed Rating
| Category | Score | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Design | 8.5/10 | Modern and versatile, appealing to different styles |
| Comfort | 9/10 | Excellent fit and cushioning for all-day wear |
| Durability | 8/10 | Well-constructed with quality materials |
| Performance | 8.5/10 | Great for various training activities |
User Reviews
Always wanted a Puma shoe but could never find a design I liked. The new design hits the mark.Very comfortable, feels like a Nike to me. ( ran in Nike for years)Lots of positive comments when I wear each one of the three I purchased.
They came super quickly and fit like Cinderella’s glass slipper and I was so impressed by how nice they felt when I got to test them out on a nice 3 mile run! Would definitely recommend!!!
Very comfy, match perfect with my puma hoodie . 💯
They fit too narrow at the toe. I needed 1 full size bigger. Get a pair that has (wide) as option . Have a great day
Great shoes, fit true to size and comfortable for casual wear or in the gym
Proper fit comfortable and look amazing
God equipament
I found the soft foam a great feature, the shoes are very comfortable to walk in and they do provide good and fitm support during workouts.The design is also very appealing with glossy hard cover on the side of the soles.I always wear 7.5 but these feel a little but too small, an 8 would have been better.